DEAN VAN HORN CONSULTING ASSOC. v. WOLD

No. C5-86-749.

395 N.W.2d 405 (1986)

DEAN VAN HORN CONSULTING ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant, v. Charles L. WOLD, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

November 4, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford G. Nelson, Joseph F. Schmidt, Nelson & Volstad, Minneapolis, for appellant.

John M. Hargens, Hargens & Sjoholm, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Considered and decided by NIERENGARTEN, P.J., and WOZNIAK and SEDGWICK, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

On appellant Dean Van Horn Consulting Associates, Inc.'s action to recover damages resulting from respondent Wold's breach of a restrictive covenant, Dean Van Horn appeals for the second time based upon the trial court's alleged error in hearing evidence on remand regarding the reasonableness of the restrictive covenant and the liquidated damages clause. The trial court found the liquidated damages clause was reasonable, but found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases