CRUMBLEY v. DITTO APPAREL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.

No. 85-286.

486 So.2d 300 (1986)

Ja Kun CRUMBLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DITTO APPAREL OF CALIFORNIA, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

April 9, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Bennett, Marksville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Provosty, Sadler & Delaunay, Albin A. Provosty, Alexandria, for defendants-appellees.

Before KNOLL, KING and BRUNSON, JJ.


BRUNSON, Judge Pro Tem.

The singular issue to be addressed on this appeal is whether the trial court was in error in finding that the plaintiff-appellant failed to prove by an overwhelming preponderance of evidence that her medical condition of contact dermatitis was contracted in the course of employment.

The plaintiff-appellant began employment with the defendant-appellee, Ditto Apparel of California, Inc. in June of 1979. Her duties consisted primarily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases