1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 21 Ohio
  5. 21 Ohio St. 3d 56 (1986)
 

THAXTON v. MEDINA CITY BD. OF EDN.

No. 84-1954.

21 Ohio St. 3d 56 (1986)

THAXTON ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. MEDINA CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided January 15, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henn & Cain and Robert B. Henn, for appellants.

Williams, Batchelder, Johnson & Bux and Robert J. Bux, for appellee Medina City Board of Education.

Jill R. Heck, prosecuting attorney, for appellees Cloverleaf Board of Education and Highland Board of Education.

Oberholtzer, Filous & Young Co., L.P.A., and Thomas J. Filous, for appellee Contemporary Photography Studio, Inc.

CLIFFORD F. BROWN, J.

I

The threshold question raised by this appeal is whether a public board of education is a "person" for purposes of the Valentine Act, R.C. Chapter 1331. R.C. 1331.01(A) defines "person" as follows:

"`Person' includes corporations, partnerships, and associations existing under or authorized by any state or territory of the United States, and solely for the purpose of the definition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases