HERTEL v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION

EAB 85-AB-1150; CA A37224; SC S33266.

730 P.2d 35 (1986)

302 Or. 456

Joseph A. HERTEL, Respondent On Review, v. EMPLOYMENT DIVISION, Respondent, and Viking Industries, Petitioner On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided December 30, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Hunt, Thomas W. Sondag, and Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson & Young, Portland, for petitioner on review.

No appearance contra.

Before PETERSON, C.J., and LENT, LINDE, CAMPBELL, CARSON and JONES, JJ.


Petition for review denied.

PETERSON, C.J., dissented and filed an opinion, in which JONES, J., joined.

PETERSON, Chief Justice, dissenting.

I would allow review.

The Court of Appeals remanded this case to the agency because it believed that the agency had failed to address claimant's contention that he had to leave work to care for his children. It stated:

"Claimant contends that, due to the irregularity of his work schedule, he was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases