MARSHALL v. BOISE CASCADE

WCB 84-09242; CA A37914.

728 P.2d 35 (1986)

82 Or.App. 130

In the matter of the Compensation of Dale H. MARSHALL, Claimant. Dale H. Marshall, Petitioner, v. BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 12, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Wollheim, Portland, argued the cause for Petitioner. With him on the brief was Welch, Bruun & Green, Portland.

Allan M. Muir, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William H. Replogle and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARREN and DEITS, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Board order that reverses the referee and holds that claimant failed to prove that his hearing loss was caused by his employment. We review de novo and affirm.

Claimant began working for Boise Cascade in 1955 and testified that he had no problems with his hearing at that time. Within two years, he was transferred to a large machine that makes toilet paper and napkins. He described...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases