1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 392 N.W.2d
  5. 392 N.W.2d 363 (1986)
 

SIMONSON v. THIN FILM TECHNOLOGY CORP.

No. C9-86-768.

392 N.W.2d 363 (1986)

Jarice L. SIMONSON, Relator, v. THIN FILM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, Department of Jobs and Training, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 26, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Winzenburg, Mankato, for relator.

Daniel E. Wall, Roseville, for Thin Film Technology Corp.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Donald E. Notvik, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for Department of Jobs and Training.

Considered and decided by LESLIE, P.J., and WOZNIAK and CRIPPEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This appeal challenges the decision that a quit based on a job reassignment was not for good cause attributable to the employer. We affirm.

FACTS

Relator was employed by Thin Film Technology Corporation beginning in 1982. She started out as a factory worker, but later she worked in the plant office, taking care of purchasing, controlling inventory, and performing other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases