HALVORSEN v. FERGUSON

No. 13498-1-I.

46 Wn. App. 708 (1986)

735 P.2d 675

MARY CATHERINE HALVORSEN, Appellant, v. WILLIAM H. FERGUSON, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

October 6, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerry Schumm and Buckland & Schumm, for appellant.

Frederick M. Meyers and Karr, Tuttle, Koch, Campbell, Mawer & Morrow, P.S., for respondents.


SWANSON, J.

Mary Catherine Halvorsen, plaintiff below, appeals a summary judgment in favor of William Wesselhoeft, et al, d/b/a Ferguson & Burdell (referred to collectively as Ferguson), defendants below, and dismissal of her action for legal malpractice. She contends that factual issues remain regarding duty, breach of duty, and proximate cause that should have been submitted to the jury. Halvorsen also assigns error to a judgment on Ferguson's

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases