PRISON LAW OFFICE v. KOENIG

Docket No. A026985.

186 Cal.App.3d 560 (1986)

233 Cal. Rptr. 590

PRISON LAW OFFICE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RONALD KOENIG, as Chairman, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

September 11, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Donald Specter and Charles S. Bishop for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Paul D. Gifford and Maria J. Fonseca, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

CHANNELL, J.

In this case of first impression, appellant Prison Law Office challenges the constitutionality of Penal Code section 3003,1 providing for return of a parolee to the county of his or her commitment when released on parole. The Prison Law Office contends that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment to respondent Ronald Koenig, Chairman of the Board of Prison Terms.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases