1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 45 Wn.
  5. 45 Wn. App. 29 (1986)
 

CAMER v. POST-INTELLIGENCER

No. 15814-7-I.

45 Wn. App. 29 (1986)

723 P.2d 1195

DOROTHY CAMER, ET AL, Appellants, v. THE SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

August 20, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dorothy Camer and Margaret Coughlin, pro se.

David Utevsky, Camden M. Hall, Lewis Taylor Egan, and Foster, Pepper & Riviera, for respondents.

PEKELIS, J.

Dorothy Camer and Margaret Coughlin appeal the trial court's order of summary judgment dismissing their libel complaint against The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (The Seattle P.I.) and reporter Susan Goldberg. Camer and Coughlin allege that the court erred in dismissing their complaint because they have established a prima facie case of defamation with convincing clarity. We affirm the trial court.

FACTS

The lawsuit arises out of an article...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases