BRENNER v. SEWALL


124 A.D.2d 620 (1986)

Rose Brenner et al., Plaintiffs, v. Marie Sewall et al., Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Rose Brenner et al., Appellants, v. Hubert S. Pearlman et al., Respondents. (And Another Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 10, 1986


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

After the trial court issued a ruling which the attorney for the plaintiffs considered to be adverse to his clients, the plaintiffs refused to proceed with the trial of their action and rested without having established a prima facie case against the respondents. Under these circumstances, it was entirely proper to enter a judgment in favor of the respondents regardless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases