MATTER OF WAGSCHAL v. BD. OF EXAM'RS OF THE BD. OF EDUC. OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK


69 N.Y.2d 672 (1986)

In the Matter of Rose Wagschal, Appellant, v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 18, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Congress and James R. Sandner for appellant.

Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Stephen J. McGrath of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR., concur.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

As stated in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, petitioner has not established that respondent's denial of her application for a permanent school psychologist license lacked a rational basis. Accordingly, the lower courts properly refused to substitute their judgment for those of public officials in charge of the educational system...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases