Judgment affirmed, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
Defendant asserts that a verdict of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell is repugnant to a verdict of not guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and that the guilty verdict was based on insufficient evidence. Inasmuch as these claims were not raised in the court of first...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.