Judgment, as amended, affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the identification testimony of the two complainants should have been suppressed due to improper police conduct and lack of a sufficient independent basis for the identifications is without merit. The identifications, made at the time of the defendant's apprehension, were spontaneous (see, People v Dukes,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.