1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 290 S.C.
  5. 290 S.C. 437 (1986)
 

ROACH v. COMBINED UTILITY COMM.

0818

290 S.C. 437 (1986)

351 S.E.2d 168

James E. ROACH, Joyce P. Brown and Harry A. Moore, as Residents of the Powdersville Community, individually and as members of the Powdersville Community Protection Group and on behalf of all others similarly situated as a class, Appellants v. The COMBINED UTILITY COMMISSION OF the CITY OF EASLEY, S.C. Respondent.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided November 17, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

V. Laniel Chapman and Bruce A. Byrholdt, of Chapman, King & Byrholdt, Anderson, for appellants.

Felix L. Finley, Jr., and George F. Townes, of The Finley Law Firm, P.A., Pickens, for respondent.

Heard Oct. 14, 1986.

Decided Nov. 17, 1986.

CURETON, Judge:

The plaintiffs, individually and as representatives of the Powdersville Community Protection Group, commenced this action for an injunction against construction of a waste water treatment plant by the Combined Utility Commission of the City of Easley. The trial judge denied the injunction. The plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Planning for the construction of the Middle Branch Treatment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases