DANAHY, Chief Judge.
The defendant challenges the imposition of costs as part of his sentence. He argues first that the trial judge erred in assessing costs pursuant to sections 960.20, 943.25(4), and 943.25(8), Florida Statutes (1985), without affording the defendant notice or hearing. He is correct. Such costs may properly be taxed against an indigent defendant, as the defendant was found to be, but only upon due notice and hearing. Jenkins v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.