FLORES v. BARRICELLA


123 A.D.2d 600 (1986)

Manuel Flores et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arcangelo Barricella, Defendant. Henry M. Gargano et al., Respondents, v. Joseph Mandell, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 6, 1986


Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The record indicates that Reich and Reich, P. C., had a charging lien for legal services rendered because it appeared as the attorney of record for Manuel and Maria Flores in their negligence action against Arcangelo Barricella (see, Rodriquez v City of New York, 66 N.Y.2d 825). The lien was not affected by the settlement of the action by the incoming attorney, the appellant Joseph Mandell...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases