ROYAL GLOBE INS. CO. v. WHITAKER

Docket No. 24491.

181 Cal.App.3d 532 (1986)

226 Cal. Rptr. 435

ROYAL GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v. SUSAN E. WHITAKER et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

May 23, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Howard L. Wesch for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Weintraub, Genshlea, Hardy, Erich & Brown and William A. Wilson for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent.


OPINION

BACKUS, J.*

This is an appeal from a trial court's ruling in a declaratory judgment that the respondent, Royal Globe Insurance Company, owed no duty to defend its insured in an underlying action for fraudulent inducement and breach of contract. We shall affirm.

FACTS

The lower court's description of the "abbreviated and skeletal nature of the trial in this case" may be something...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases