ALEXANDER v. KAY FINLAY JEWELERS, INC.


208 N.J. Super. 503 (1986)

506 A.2d 379

JOSEPH A. ALEXANDER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. KAY FINLAY JEWELERS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ESTATE OF MORRIS NUSSBAUM, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 10, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patella & Plaia, attorneys for appellant (Christopher L. Patella, of counsel and on the brief).

Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, attorneys for respondent (John E. Keale, of counsel; Thomas F. McGuane, on the brief).

Before Judges FRITZ, GAYNOR and BAIME.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GAYNOR, J.A.D.

In this case, plaintiff seeks to extend the Pierce1 doctrine to a dismissal of an at-will employee concededly due to the commencement of a civil action by the employee against the employer as a means of resolving a salary dispute. We agree with the trial judge's conclusion that the termination of employment under such circumstances does not violate a clear mandate of public...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases