Judgment affirmed.
There was sufficient evidence adduced at the suppression hearing to support the court's finding of probable cause to arrest defendant, since the facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer at the time of defendant's apprehension were such as would warrant a prudent person to conclude that defendant had committed the burglary which the officer had been called to investigate (CPL 140.10 [1] [b]; see, People v Oden,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.