Judgment affirmed.
In view of the conflicting psychiatric testimony as to the defendant's capacity to know or appreciate the nature and consequences of his conduct on the date of the incident in question, to wit, April 18, 1982, or that such conduct was wrong, it was proper to submit the question of the defendant's criminal responsibility to the jury, and, based upon the instant record, we do not find that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
