1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 638 F.Supp.
  5. 638 F.Supp. 66 (1986)
 

UNITED STATES FOOTBALL LEAGUE v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE

No. 84 CIV. 7484 (PKL).

638 F.Supp. 66 (1986)

UNITED STATES FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 30, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Meyerson & Casey, Spengler Carlson Gubar Brodsky & Frischling, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Davis Polk & Wardwell, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York City, Covington & Burling, Washington, D.C., for defendants.

ORDER # 7

LEISURE, District Judge:

Defendants ("NFL") have moved to bar plaintiffs ("USFL") from introducing evidence of damages predicated on claims allegedly not pleaded. According to defendants, plaintiffs' proposed damages evidence is based upon a theory of antitrust damage that does not appear in the First Amended Complaint ("amended complaint"). Specifically, this theory provides that were it not for the NFL's violations of the antitrust laws, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases