PERRY v. BOROUGH OF SWEDESBORO


214 N.J. Super. 488 (1986)

520 A.2d 410

CARL PERRY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOROUGH OF SWEDESBORO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 30, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Caryl M. Amana argued the cause for appellant (Caryl M. Amana, on the brief).

Charles R. Iannuzzi argued the cause for respondent (Charles R. Iannuzzi, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, SHEBELL and STERN.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff has appealed from a dismissal of his complaint for additional compensation based upon his being required to be on duty or on call as a police officer for a 24-hour period every other day. The trial judge's decision is reported at 204 N.J.Super. 103 (Law Div. 1985).

In view of the complete analysis of the case by the trial judge, we need but briefly state the facts. By reason of personnel problems...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases