PRINCETON SPORTSWEAR v. H & M ASSOC.


510 Pa. 189 (1986)

507 A.2d 339

PRINCETON SPORTSWEAR CORPORATION, Appellant, v. H & M ASSOCIATES, Sidney Becker and Leonard Becker, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided March 27, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl M. Mazzocone, Lewis Kates, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Robert B. Bodzin, Robert H. Malis, Philadelphia, for appellees.

Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, HUTCHINSON, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.


OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

This case involves a dispute between a landlord and a tenant, initiated by the landlord's refusal to restore electricity, heat and elevator service to the tenant's building after a fire in an adjacent building resulted in a shut-down of those services. The trial court, sitting as chancellor, found in favor of the tenant, appellant herein, and against the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases