1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 118 A.D.2d
  5. 118 A.D.2d 575 (1986)
 

MATTER OF OSSINING URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY v. LORD

118 A.D.2d 575 (1986)

In the Matter of Ossining Urban Renewal Agency, Appellant, v. Elissa Lord et al., Defendants, and Pine Top Building Corp., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 3, 1986

Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248).

Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We find no merit to the appellant's contention that the supplemental report of the Commissioners of Appraisal was too vague, precluding intelligent judicial review. The damage issues have been extensively litigated and we find no reason to disturb the Commissioners...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases