1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 496 So.2d
  5. 496 So.2d 190 (1986)
 

HERBERT v. TECNOMARK SERVICE, INC.

No. 86-462.

496 So.2d 190 (1986)

Francis Lansdale HERBERT, Jr., John Theodore Petersen, Jr., Thomas W. Stewart, Precision Packaging & Container, Inc., and T.W. Stewart & Associates, Inc., Appellants, v. TECNOMARK SERVICE, INC., James C. Urban and Samuel Z. Shoshan, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Rehearing Denied November 17, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A.P. Walter, Jr., Coral Gables, and Martin L. Hannan, Miami, for appellants.

Britton, Schantz & Schatzman and Geoffrey S. Aaronson, Miami, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Finding no basis for affording appellants the benefit of their unperformed contract, we affirm the trial court's order denying their motion to dissolve the temporary injunction previously affirmed in Herbert v. Tecnomark Service, Inc., 461 So.2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). See Superior Uniforms, Inc. v. Brown, 211 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases