Judgment affirmed.
That branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which sought to suppress identification testimony was properly denied since the complainant pointed out the fleeing defendant to police officers as one of the men who had just robbed and assaulted him with a gun. That spontaneous identification of the defendant and his pursuit by an officer who never lost sight of him obviated any risk of a mistaken identification (see, People v Simmons
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.