JACOBS v. GREAT PACIFIC CENTURY CORP.


104 N.J. 580 (1986)

518 A.2d 223

SAMUEL A. JACOBS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL THOSE SIMILARLY SITUATED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. GREAT PACIFIC CENTURY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 16, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael R. Griffinger argued the cause for defendant-appellant and cross-respondent (Crummy, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, attorneys).

Bruce H. Nagel argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants (Meth, Nagel, Rice, Woehling & Bausch, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

We granted certification, 102 N.J. 397 (1986), primarily to consider whether, in the absence of an express contractual provision, the interest earned on a real estate deposit should be considered the property of the seller or buyer. The issue arises in the context of an agreement which specifically requires that the deposit be held in an interest bearing trust account. We find that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases