TUTTLE v. BLOOMFIELD HILLS SCH.

Docket No. 88842.

156 Mich. App. 527 (1986)

402 N.W.2d 54

TUTTLE v. BLOOMFIELD HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided December 2, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fieger & Fieger (by Errol Shifman), for plaintiff.

May, Gowing, Mosher & Simpson (by Richard U. Mosher and Carol L. VonDale), for defendant.

Before: M.J. KELLY, P.J., and D.E. HOLBROOK, JR., and T.M. GREEN, JJ.


M.J. KELLY, P.J.

In this case, we are presented with the first impression issue of whether a union employee must first use and exhaust the grievance remedies provided for under the collective bargaining agreement when contesting disciplinary actions taken by his employer in alleged retaliation for "whistleblowing activities." We hold that under the Michigan Whistleblowers' Protection Act, 1980 PA 469; MCL 15.361 et seq.; MSA 17.428(1) et seq., plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases