1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 380 N.W.2d
  5. 380 N.W.2d 296 (1986)
 

HILL v. CITY OF LINCOLN

No. 85-257.

380 N.W.2d 296 (1986)

221 Neb. 719

James D. HILL and Kenneth L. Ideen, in Person and for all Persons Similarly Situated, Appellants and Cross-Appellees, v. CITY OF LINCOLN, Nebraska, a Municipal Corporation, Appellee and Cross-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Nebraska.

January 24, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald Rosenberg, of Rosenberg Law Offices, Lincoln, for appellees members Lincoln Police Union Local No. 544.

Charles F. Noren, Lincoln, for appellees employees affected by the decision.

William G. Blake, of Pierson, Ackerman, Fitchett, Akin & Hunzeker, Lincoln, for appellee City of Lincoln.

Edward F. Carter, Jr., of Barney, Carter & Johnson, P.C., Lincoln, for appellant Shaeffer.

J. Murry Shaeffer, of Shaeffer, Boucher & Hawk, P.C., Lincoln, for appellants Hill and Ideen et al.

KRIVOSHA, C.J., and BOSLAUGH, WHITE, HASTINGS, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, and GRANT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This case was brought as a class action and sought the return of a certain portion of wage deductions which had been contributed to the funding of retirement benefits for policemen and firemen employed by the City of Lincoln.

The appeal on the substantive issue was decided by our opinion found in Hill v. City of Lincoln, 213 Neb. 517, 330 N.W.2d 471 (1983). The effect...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases