INDEPENDENT PETROCHEMICAL v. AETNA CAS. & SUR. CO.

Civ. A. No. 83-3347.

672 F.Supp. 1 (1986)

INDEPENDENT PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

August 8, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerold Oshinsky, Anderson, Baker, Kill & Olick, Washington, D.C., for Independent Petrochemical Corp., Charter Oil Co. and Charter Co.

Stephen L. Nightingale, Washington, D.C., for Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co.

Lawrence E. Carr, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Continental Ins. Co.

John P. Arness, Washington, D.C., for Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.

Dennis Flannery and Wm. J. Perlstein, Washington, D.C., for Ins. Co. of North America.

Barry R. Ostrager, New York City, for Travelers Indem. Co.

Richard H. Gimer, Santarelli & Bond, Washington, D.C., for American Employers' Ins. Co. and Commercial Union Ins. Co.

Peter Schlesinger, Michael Nussbaum and Earl C. Dudley, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and London Market Ins. Companies.

James C. Gregg, James W. Greene, Washington, D.C., for Continental Cas. Co., North Star Reinsurance Corp., American Re-insurance Co. and Unigard Mut. Ins. Co.

John P. Arness, Washington, D.C., for First State Ins. Co.

Robert E. Heggestad, Casey, Scott & Canfield, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Harbor Ins. Co.

James P. Schaller and M. Elizabeth Medaglia, Jackson & Campbell, Washington, D.C., for American Home Assur. Co., Ins. Co. of State of Pa., and Lexington Ins. Co.

Jas. T. Wharton, Jas. C. Gregg and Jas. C. Greene, Annapolis, Md., for Midland Ins. Co.

Robert F. McDermott, Jr., Lawrence P. Postol, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Washington, D.C., for Corporate Ins. & Reinsurance Co. Ltd.

Andrew H. Marks, Crowell & Moring, Washington, D.C., Alan Miller, Bethesda, Md., for U.S. Fire Ins. Co.

Paul L. Friedman, Carolyn B. Lamn, Michael D. Sullivan, White & Case, Lloyd H. Randolph, Craig, Alan Wilson, Washington, D.C., for Pacific Indem. Co.


MEMORANDUM

FLANNERY, District Judge.

This matter once again comes before the court on various motions. Plaintiffs have moved for reconsideration and clarification of the court's May 2, 1986 Memorandum and Order and Declaration, 654 F.Supp. 1334, 1349, regarding both the trigger of coverage issue and the denial of privilege for certain documents. Defendant Mission Insurance Company ("Mission") has moved to stay all proceedings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases