1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 178 Cal.App.3d
  5. 178 Cal.App.3d 494 (1986)
 

BOEHM v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. F006320.

178 Cal.App.3d 494 (1986)

223 Cal. Rptr. 716

IRENE BOEHM et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MERCED COUNTY, Respondent; COUNTY OF MERCED et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

March 5, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Melinda R. Bird, Richard A. Rothschild and Paul Babwin for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

William E. Gnass, County Counsel, and David R. Ortega, Deputy County Counsel, for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

HAMLIN, J.

Petitioners Irene Boehm and other Merced County residents who receive general assistance welfare payments (GA) seek mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Merced County to issue a preliminary injunction against the reduction of GA by the Merced County Board of Supervisors (the County) and the Merced County Department of Human Resources (the Department) and to grant petitioners' motion for summary judgment.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases