BARMAT v. JOHN AND JANE DOE PARTNERS A-D

No. 2 CA-CIV 5614.

155 Ariz. 515 (1986)

747 P.2d 1214

Ziva BARMAT, on Behalf of herself and as personal representative of the Estate of Charles Barmat, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. JOHN AND JANE DOE PARTNERS A-D, et al., Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

June 25, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. James Harrison, P.C. by John Gabroy and Richard M. Rollman, Jones, Dickerman, Nuckolls, Edwards & Smith, P.C. by Sharmila R. Mahajan, Tucson, for plaintiff/appellant.

Gallagher & Kennedy, P.A. by Michael K. Kennedy and Chris J. Scheldrups, Phoenix, for defendants/appellees.


OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

Appellant Ziva Barmat, for herself and as personal representative of the estate of her husband, Charles Barmat, seeks reversal of the summary judgment entered in favor of appellee Edward Hochuli and his law partners (hereafter Hochuli) in appellant's legal malpractice action. The trial court found that Hochuli was immune from suit pursuant to A.R.S. § 20-675(A). We disagree and reverse.

This convoluted case began in February...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases