1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 649 F.Supp.
  5. 649 F.Supp. 19 (1986)
 

CARTER v. CITIBANK

No. 85 CV 3787.

649 F.Supp. 19 (1986)

Arthur Thomas CARTER, Jr., Plaintiff, v. CITIBANK, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

October 15, 1986.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jethro M. Eisenstein, Friedman & Eisenstein, New York City, for plaintiff.

Franklin S. Bonem, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn, New York City, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This case presents an issue of first impression: is a claimant under 28 U.S.C. § 1875 entitled to a jury trial?

Facts

Plaintiff has commenced suit against his former employer, alleging that he was discharged because of his service as a federal grand juror, in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 1875. Section 1875 was enacted as part of the Jury System Improvements Act of 1978.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases