CITY OF LOMITA v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B020914.

186 Cal.App.3d 479 (1986)

230 Cal. Rptr. 790

CITY OF LOMITA et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

October 16, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Burke, Williams & Sorensen, Leland C. Dolley, J. Robert Flandrick and Virginia R. Pesola for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

De Witt Clinton, County Counsel, Daniel D. Mikesell, Jr., and Rafael A. Ongkeko, Deputy County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest.

Gerald J. Geerlings, County Counsel (Riverside), William C. Katzenstein and Joyce Manulis Reikes, Deputy County Counsel, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

KINGSLEY, Acting P.J.

In November 1983 this court rendered an opinion regarding the duty of the county to provide emergency ambulance service for its residents. We are advised in the present litigation that some substantial misunderstanding has arisen between the administration of Los Angeles County and various cities in said county with reference to the extent and nature of the duties so required. (1) That original...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases