STATE v. NAPP GRECCO CO.


211 N.J. Super. 450 (1986)

511 A.2d 1266

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. THE NAPP GRECCO COMPANY, ET ALS., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Burlington County.

Decided May 10, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laurel A. Price for plaintiff (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General, New Jersey, Attorney).

David R. Simon for defendant Napp Grecco Co. (Simon & Allen, Attorneys).

Steven A. Asher admitted pro hac vice for defendant Henkels & McCoy, Inc. (White & Vzdavinis, Attorneys).

Joel S. Bergman for defendant Joseph M. Napp.


WELLS, J.S.C.

The issue raised by an exchange of correspondence between the parties and agreed at the management conference to be disposed of based thereon without oral argument is the adequacy of certain answers to written interrogatories propounded on the State in this civil anti-trust action. A further question surrounds the adequacy of the State's certification to the answers.

The amended complaint filed herein charges Napp Grecco and H & M, Inc. with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases