Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
We find no error in the trial court's determination that the plaintiff failed to "establish that at all times he has maintained the unit as his primary residence and intends to occupy it as such at the expiration of the sublease" (Administrative Code of City of New York § YY51-6.0 [c] [12] [b]; see, Real Property Law § 226-b; Tagert v 211 E. 70th St. Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.