Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioners seek to challenge the respondents' policy of recoupment of interim Home Relief benefits (see, Social Services Law § 158 [a]; 18 NYCRR 370.7; 20 CFR 416.1901) as an unconstitutional denial of equal protection under the Federal and State Constitutions (US Const 5th, 14th Amends; NY Const, art I, § II). By analogy to Matter of Lee v Smith (
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.