HEDRICK v. MOTORISTS MUT. INS. CO.

No. 84-1950.

22 Ohio St. 3d 42 (1986)

HEDRICK, APPELLEE, v. MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 5, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dale S. Economus, for appellee.

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs Co., L.P.A., and Orville L. Reed III, for appellant.


DOUGLAS, J.

Appellant asserts that the issue raised is whether the insurance policy provision in question constitutes a valid anti-stacking provision. After careful review of the policy provision in question, this court cannot concur in appellant's assessment of the issue presented by these facts. Rather, this court finds that the issue presented in the case is whether the policy provision is an exclusionary provision which operates to bar recovery herein. For the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases