STATE v. BRITTEN

No. 17090-2-I.

46 Wn. App. 571 (1986)

731 P.2d 508

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ROGER PAUL BRITTEN, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

November 24, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Annie E. Roberts of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for appellant.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Nicole MacInnes, Deputy, for respondent.


PEKELIS, J.

Roger Britten appeals from his conviction in juvenile court for third degree theft. He contends that the evidence was sufficient only to support a conviction for attempted third degree theft. We disagree and affirm.

Britten was charged by information with theft in the third degree, in violation of RCW 9A.56.050 and 9A.56.020(1)(a). After a fact finding hearing, he was found guilty as charged. Thereafter, the court entered findings of fact and conclusions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases