On this appeal, defendant contends that (1) the prosecution failed to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that defendant intended to commit the crime of arson in the second degree, (2) County Court's charge on the issue of defendant's intoxication as it related to his intent to commit the crime of arson was inadequate, and (3) the sentence was harsh and excessive. These contentions must be rejected.
The record demonstrates that on the date...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.