HARRIS v. RIZKALLA


120 A.D.2d 492 (1986)

Steven Harris et al., Respondents, v. Sam N. Rizkalla, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 5, 1986


Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiffs do not, in fact, seek recovery of child-rearing expenses by way of the fifth and sixth causes of action sounding in contract, and, indeed, concede that such recovery in connection with a failed vasectomy is impermissible under New York law whether the claim sounds in contract or in tort (see, O'Toole v Greenberg, 64 N.Y.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases