ADDLEMAN v. BOARD OF PRISON TERMS AND PAROLES

No. 52748-2.

107 Wn.2d 503 (1986)

730 P.2d 1327

LINCOLN LANE ADDLEMAN, JR., ET AL, Appellants, v. THE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS AND PAROLES, ET AL, Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 31, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lincoln Lane Addleman, Jr., pro se, and John G. Ziegler, James E. Lobsenz (of Wolfe, Lobsenz & Cullen), and John B. Midgley, for appellants.

Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, Kathleen D. Spong, Senior Assistant, and Paul A. Silver and Aaron K. Owada, Assistants, for respondents.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney for King County, Deborah J. Phillips, Senior Appellate Attorney, and Robert S. Lasnik, Chief of Staff, and Michael Redman on behalf of Washington Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, amici curiae for respondents.


GOODLOE, J.

We accepted certified review of consolidated habeas corpus petitions alleging the original RCW 9.95.009 has (1) an ex post facto infirmity due to its abolition of the Board of Prison Terms and Paroles in 1988 and (2) statutory construction problems and equal protection problems resulting from interpretations in two Court of Appeals opinions. Recently enacted legislation corrects the ex post facto concern and clarifies the statute's intent remedying the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases