CORP v. ARCO

No. 13737-9-I.

45 Wn. App. 563 (1986)

726 P.2d 66

CRAIG D. CORP, ET AL, Respondents, v. ATLANTIC-RICHFIELD COMPANY, Petitioner.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

October 6, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce M. Pym, Gary Robbins, and Graham & Dunn, for petitioner.

Carl A. Taylor Lopez and Lopez, Fantel & Taylor, for respondents.


COLE, J.*

Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) petitions for discretionary review of a trial court decision that certain convenience stores operated in conjunction with ARCO gas stations constituted franchises under RCW 19.100, the Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA).

FACTS

Respondents, Craig Corp, et al, were originally lessees of ARCO service stations. In 1976, ARCO offered an arrangement

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases