SHERMAN v. WHIRLPOOL CORP.

No. C7-85-2220.

386 N.W.2d 221 (1986)

Sharon J. SHERMAN, Respondent, v. WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Relators, Steve Keefe, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, Intervenor, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 2, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald W. Anderson, Minneapolis, for relators.

Richard C. Monks, Minneapolis, for Sharon Sherman.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Harold W. Schultz, II, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


YETKA, Justice.

On November 4, 1983, employee-respondent Sharon J. Sherman submitted a request for rehabilitation benefits to the Department of Labor and Industry. A rehabilitation specialist found Sherman eligible for rehabilitation services by an order filed March 14, 1984. Employer-relator Whirlpool and insurer-relator Aetna appealed, and the rehabilitation review panel affirmed the specialist's order on March 11, 1985. Relators appealed to the WCCA, which affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases