STATE v. IRWIN

No. 13735-2-I.

43 Wn. App. 553 (1986)

718 P.2d 826

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. JACK E. IRWIN, SR., ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

May 5, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey Steinborn, for appellants.

David S. McEachran, Prosecuting Attorney, and Martha V. Gross, Deputy, for respondent.


RINGOLD, A.C.J.

At a bench trial Jack E. Irwin, Sr. and Jack E. Irwin, Jr. were found guilty of several violations of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, RCW 69.50, and one count each of conspiracy. They appeal arguing: (1) that conversations taped in violation of the Privacy Act, RCW 9.73, were improperly admitted; (2) that the affidavits supporting the search warrants of their property were invalid; (3) that they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases