Judgment affirmed.
The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which sought to suppress his confessions. The first of the challenged confessions was made at the time of the defendant's arrest in response to a police officer's question which was aimed at clarification of the situation confronted by the officer rather than to elicit incriminating evidence and, thus, was permissible in the absence of Miranda warnings (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.