MILLER v. McALISTER

No. 1 CA-CIV 7936.

151 Ariz. 435 (1986)

728 P.2d 654

R. Gordon MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Roy E. McALISTER and Kathleen Ann McAlister, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

Review Denied December 2, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Minkler & Kirschbaum by Charles E. Cruise, Phoenix, for plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee.

Roy E. McAlister, in pro. per.


OPINION

CONTRERAS, Judge.

The threshold and dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a trial judge is obligated to render findings of fact and conclusions of law when properly requested to do so by a party pursuant to Rule 52(a), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure. We conclude that the trial judge, when requested to do so, must set forth findings of fact and conclusions of law, and on that basis, we reverse the judgment below and remand the case to the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases