Judgment, as amended, affirmed.
On appeal, the defendant contends that the hearing court erred in denying the branch of his motion which was to suppress statements because they were not made voluntarily. Contrary to the defendant's claim, the hearing court's determination that the defendant's statements were made voluntarily and spontaneously and without any physical or psychological coercion was supported by the record (see, People v Rivers,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
