Judgment affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to redact those portions of the defendant's videotaped statement in which the defendant refused to answer questions propounded by the Assistant District Attorney. The defendant's contention is without merit. The defendant never requested, either at the suppression hearing or at trial, that the court redact those portions of his statement; this issue is therefore unpreserved for review...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
