DiBERNARDO v. MOSLEY


206 N.J. Super. 371 (1986)

502 A.2d 1166

VINCENT R. DIBERNARDO AND VINCENT DIBERNARDO AND LUCY DIBERNARDO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. ALBERT J. MOSLEY AND HELEN E. MOSLEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 3, 1986.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Bailey argued the cause for appellants (Robert E. Bailey, attorney).

Thomas R. Uliase argued the cause for respondents (Thomas R. Uliase, attorney).

Before Judges ANTELL, SHEBELL and MUIR.


The opinion of the court was delivered by, ANTELL, P.J.A.D.

Defendants appeal and plaintiffs cross-appeal from a judgment for money damages and reasonable attorneys' fees upon a jury verdict for plaintiffs under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq. The suit is based upon a claim of fraudulent concealment of a defective septic system within a home sold by defendants to plaintiffs. Although the parties argue issues touching upon the sufficiency...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases